Thursday 26 September 2013

Afghanistan: Modernization or Westernization?

The failure of West in "modernizing" Afghanistan

One of the great misunderstandings among many misunderstandings of the West about Afghanistan is the attempt at westernizing Afghanistan. The term “westernization,” according to Thong Tezenlo in the book “To Raise the Savage to a Higher Level: The Westernization of Nagas and their Culture” refers to an attempt and a process in which societies are changed and nations adopt Western culture in different ways such as by following politics, religious belief, philosophy, law, language and the adoption of western lifestyle.
A model walks in a fashion show sponsored by US embassy in Kabul and organised by Women rights organisation "Young Women for Change" 
With the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 many journalists, analysts and politicians tried to make people believe there was a need to liberate Afghan women from the oppression they were facing and a need to change the society for the good of the people. But the history of Afghanistan makes it clear that the struggle of people to preserve their identity and conservative Afghan society against any kind of westernization does not preclude support for the modernization of Afghan society that includes progress in the educational and health sectors of the society. People of Afghanistan value their culture, traditions and religious beliefs more than anything else and thus that is the reason that today Afghans are very well known for their hospitality across the Asian continent.

In the past, when King Amanullah Khan made a drastic move to modernize Afghanistan with the help of his father-in-law and foreign affairs minister Mahmud Tarzi, who was inspired by the work of Ata Turk of Turkey, the religious hardliners and tribal leaders toppled his Kingship in a heartbeat forcing him to flee the country in 1929. Later a slow reform was introduced by both King Zahir Shah and President Sardar Mohammad Dawud but they too failed miserably.
Afghan women in 1962 wearing both burqa and westernized clothes introduced by the King at the time, an attempt to "westernize" Afghan society.
Many activists groups and non governmental organisations have been receiving aid from the American embassy to create such an unfavorable environment in Afghanistan. In February this year the American Embassy financed a fashion show with the help of a women’s rights activist group called “Young Women for Change,” described as a “female empowerment project” even though the audience was largely foreigners including journalists, but many Afghans criticized the action by naming it the “westernization” of Kabul. In July 2013 a religious parliamentarian declared “Jihad” against a talent show because of the way girls dressed and danced on the floor. “I have already made it clear in the lower house that I am going to start a jihad against these kind of shows and programmes on our television channels,” said Abdul Sattar Khawasi, quoted by the Telegraph. Mr Khawasi was furthermore quoted about a pop idol singing contest called “The Voice of Afghanistan” which is storming the country with its popularity. “Look at its name, The Voice of Afghanistan, how sweet the name is and how great it looks, but unfortunately look at the contents of the show – it does not represent the culture and customs of our country.”
Such views are shared by common people across Afghanistan; that’s why we see members of Parliament trying to stop such shows that promote westernization. The Telegraph quoted an Afghan student who clearly mentioned that such shows in fact promote westernization and have nothing to do with women’s rights or their empowerment: “I have watched “The Voice of Afghanistan” a little bit, but I did not like it because of the way the judges are dressed and especially that female one. It is totally a Western thing,” he said. Now, however, the West has dropped the ball in anticipation that Afghans will embrace a Western culture specifically applied to the entertainment business–with the hope that Afghanistan could be turned into Las Vegas or New York, where one singular sensational broadway dance is performed openly and people will accept this change in the society. But the fact is that over 97% of Afghanistan is made of strict conservative individuals who follow Islam and in their majority are demanding Islamic Shariah law in the country. Rest assured, it will not only fail catastrophically, but it will fail with bloody consequence.
The influence of westernizing the non-western countries across the world made people believe that westernizing society is a form of modernization but one can argue that nations can follow their traditions, culture, language and be proud of their history while at the same time be modern. This is the case with people in Afghanistan and they have the right to follow their religion, culture and traditions without anyone meddling in their affairs.
Posted by at No comments:

Friday 6 September 2013

The Nazi-US flag


I'm offended to see US flag as much as any Jew and their sympathizers are offended to see flag of Nazis. I'm offended because this flag and the fake patriotism for this flag killed millions of Natives, it destroyed the life of Apache, Arikara, the Comanche and others. I'm offended to see this flag because in the name of freedom and security innocent civilians of Panama were bombarded, I'm offended to see this flag because of the so called protectors of this flag such as the recipient of "Medal of freedom" Madeleine Albright psychopathic view that it was worth killing 500,000 innocent Iraqi children for nonexistent WMD. I'm offended to see this fascist flag that killed over 8000 innocent civilians in Afghanistan under Clinton administration, I'm offended because for the glory of this flag Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed. It's offending to see a flag and its supporters who sponsor state terrorism against innocent Palestinians and are supporters of barbaric, racist and oppressive state like Israel. What this flag reminds me is the innocent Vietnamese that were sprayed with "Agent Orange" chemical weapons, it reminds me of Fallujah and all those deformed babies born till today, it reminds me of uranium weapons used till today in Afghanistan in the name of "war on terror" and "democracy", it reminds me of Obama and his fake promises of closing Guantanamo, it reminds me of the horror of all those detainees detained without any fair trial, it reminds me of the drones and the fear among innocent civilians of Afghanistan, Yemen, Pakistan and Somalia who hear the sound of drone planes and wait for their home to be destroyed and be labelled as "suspected terrorists".
People get offended by seeing Nazi flag but they don't realize that the representatives of US flag murdered far more innocent people than the representatives of Nazi flag.


I'm offended by this flag who believes they have the right to police the world and that they are the only civilized nation with freedom and liberty. What this flag and its fake patriots brought to the world is nothing but genocide, misery, destruction and hatred, it didn't helped the poor nor it brought freedom to the oppressed but it brought more profit to rich corporations and more power to corrupt greedy politicians. This fake patriotism not only gave an excuse to politicians to wage wars abroad but it brought tyranny at home and made US a police state where it's illegal to feed homeless individuals, where crime rate is higher than the so called "third world", where cities like Detroit needs more help than countries like Iraq or Afghanistan, where it's more likely to be killed by police than by some lunatic terrorist.

People need to understand that we should never support governments and military that are oppressing innocent people around the world, that are destroying our peace and are taking our freedom in the name of "security" and "development". We the people of the world must love each other and be united against these psychopaths who rule upon us in the name of "democracy" and some other form of government that give nothing but illusion of freedom.

Posted by at No comments:

Monday 2 September 2013

NWO is Communist Jewish World Order

"Some call it Marxism ~ I call it Judaism." ~ The American Bulletin, Rabbi S. Wise, May 5, 1935



"The Communist soul is the soul of Judaism. Hence it follows that, just as in the Russian revolution the triumph of Communism was the triumph of Judaism, so also in the triumph of fascism will triumph Judaism."  ~ A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Rabbi Harry Waton, p. 143-144

"The Bolshevist revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new order in the world.  What was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction, and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all over the world." ~ The American Hebrew September 10, 1920

"The Communists are against religion (Christianity), and they seek to destroy religion; yet, when we look deeper into the nature of Communism, we see that it is essential nothing else than a religion (Judaism)."  ~ A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Rabbi Harry Waton, p. 138 

"The Jews welcome this revolution in the Christian world, and the Jews should show an example. It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism: all this was in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews." ~ A Program for the Jews and Humanity, by Rabbi Harry Waton, p. 148 

"We have exterminated the property owners in Russia. We are going to do the same thing in Europe and America." ~ The Jew, December 1925, Zinobit

"The world revolution which we will experience will be exclusively our affair and will rest in our hands. This revolution will tighten the Jewish domination over all other people." ~ Le Peuple Juif, February 8, 1919.

"The governments of the peoples included in this world republic, with the aid of the victorious proletariat, all will fall without difficulty into Jewish hands. Private property will then be strangled by the Jewish directors, who will administer the state patrimony everywhere. Thus the promise of the Talmud will be fulfilled, that is, the promise that the Jews, at the arrival of the Messiah, will possess the key to the wealth of all the peoples of the earth." ~ Baruch Levy, in a letter to Karl Marx, published in the Rothschild controlled La Revue de Paris, June 1, 1928.

"Judaism and Communism are one and the same." ~ HILARY COTTER, author of Cardinal Minszenty, The Truth About His Real "Crime," page 6. "Communism is Judaism. The Jewish Bolshevik Revolution was in 1917 Russia." ~ H.H. BEAMISH, N.Y. speech, 1937 ("The Secret Force" by Maurice Pinay)

"Judaism and Communism are one and the same." ~ HILARY COTTER, author of Cardinal Minszenty, The Truth About His Real "Crime," page 6

"Communism is Judaism. The Jewish Bolshevik Revolution was in 1917 Russia." ~ H.H. BEAMISH, N.Y. speech, 1937 ("The Secret Force" by Maurice Pinay) !!!

“The Jew is an inborn communist”! Otto Weininger, a Jew, Sex & Character, pp 311 !

“Zionism is Judaism, and Judaism is unthinkable without Zionism.” (Harper’s Encyclopedia of United States History, Vol. X, “Zionists”).

“Some call it Marxism (Communism), I call it Judaism.” – Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise - The American Bulletin, May 5, 1935. (Judaism is nothing but disguised, camouflaged Communism, therefore, Zionism is nothing but Communism) !!!

“Bolshevism and Communism, were Jewish proposed, Jewish financed, Jewish led and Jewish operated. The most muderous regime this planet has ever known, was Jewish through & through.” ~ ("The Secret Force" by Maurice Pinay) !!!

"Judaism and Communism are one and the same." ~ HILARY COTTER, author of Cardinal Minszenty, The Truth About His Real "Crime," page 6. "Communism is Judaism. The Jewish Bolshevik Revolution was in 1917 Russia." ~ H.H. BEAMISH, N.Y. speech, 1937 ("The Secret Force" by Maurice Pinay)


Posted by at 1 comment:

Fatwa Regarding the Saudi Regime



Shaykh Abu Baseer Al-Tartusi

Question:

I think it is not hidden from the likes of you what has happened and is now happening in the Arabian Peninsula under the Saudi rule... If you would – may Allah preserve you – direct the youths to what is obligatory for them to do, especially since the government has begun to target the people of Iman and Jihad, either by imprisoning them or killing them, and what happened to Shaykh Yusuf al-'Uyayri is not far from us... So groups of the youths have now decided to take revenge for what the Saudi government has done or will do. So some of them have begun to buy weapons. And other groups of the youths fear that there will be a repeat in the Arabian Peninsula of that which occurred in Algeria, but at the same time they see that a great Fitnah and killing is about to take place, especially if the Saudi government continues to restrict the people of knowledge and Jihad. So they view that it is necessary for them to buy weapons, from handguns to explosives, and to train with them in order to defend themselves and their families in the event of a civil war or revolution or the like.

These youths have – among those who answer their questions and share their concerns – 'Ulama' whom they trust in terms of their knowledge, and who live in the Peninsula and witness the situation there and see it around them. However, as you know – may Allah bless you – the houses of these 'Ulama' have been besieged, and they have been led away to prison, to remain there for an indefinite period. This is if they are convicted of rebellion.

And the government has even fabricated lies about these 'Ulama', for when they arrested Shaykh 'Ali al-Khudhayr, Shaykh Nasir al-Fahd and Shaykh Ahmad al-Khalidi, they broadcast that they found along with these Mashayikh weapons and explosives! And before that, they accused them of founding a group called "The Muwahhideen for the overthrow of the Saudi government", and that they had a hand in the explosions that occurred in Riyadh, even though the Mashayikh – may Allah preserve them – had denied both accusations!

O Shaykh, the youths are confused and afraid at the same time. For they fear for themselves to even ask about what is obligatory upon them to do. And if they ask someone, the one who is asked will usually shy away from the question, and will summarise and not give details. The integrity of the Committee of Major Scholars (Hay'at Kibaril-'Ulama') has fallen in the eyes of many of the youths, and they look at any statement from the Committee of Major Scholars as if it is a statement from the Interior Ministry or another Ministry... for this reason, we hope that you will give us an explanation and advice.

Answer:

All praise is due to Allah, the Lord of all that exists.

This is a big question... I wished that the Saudi regime would not push the youths to the extent that they would be forced to send the like of this question... and I have received many questions similar to it. I wished from the Saudi regime – in observance of the sacredness of the two noble Haramayn, and its peaceful worshippers – that it would not put itself in this position, and that it would leave us alone as we have left it alone, but it has insisted on brandishing the stick, and on mistreating us, and being an open enemy, and being a helper to the Tawagheet of the infidels in the world against the Muslim Muwahhideen from the people of the Peninsula and outside of it, in the name of "fighting terrorism"... even though they themselves are the masters of terrorism and criminality.

In order to answer this question, it is necessary to mention the following facts:

[1] The Saudi regime is a mixture of Haqq (truth) and Batil (falsehood). The Haqq aspect of it tends to be restricted to verbal claims, such as the outward symbols of Tawhid on their flag, and their claim that they are an Islamic, Salafi state, and that they implement the Islamic Shari'ah, and other than that from the great claims that we wish they were truthful in... and these continue to deceive many of the people!

As for their Batil, then it tends to manifest itself physically, in the real world... and it is clearer proof of the reality of their regime than what they claim with the tongue. And examples of this falsehood may be found in the following:

[a] It is a regime that does not rule by what Allah has revealed in every aspect of life, particular and general, rather it is a regime that rules by what Allah revealed in certain cases to the exclusion of other cases... it believes in part of the Book and disbelieves in part... and this may be noticed easily by anyone who would like to observe the Saudi legal system... and this contradicts many of the Shar'i texts that obligate referring the judgement back to the Book and the Sunnah in every aspects, as in the Saying of Allah (ta'ala) [meaning]:

"So if you differ in anything, then refer it back to Allah and the Messenger, in you really believe in Allah and in the Last Day. That is better, and more suitable for a final explanation."

So His Saying (ta'ala): "...in anything..." is a general term that indicates anything and everything in which people might differ.

It is an immature regime, convinced – as it has been for a long time – that it is not capable of relying on itself or its people for support,... So in the past, Al Sa'ud stretched out their hands to the British in order to help them strengthen their kingdom and authority against the Ikhwan movement, the followers of Shaykh Muhammad ibn 'Abdil-Wahhab (rahimahullah) and others... to the extent that the founder of the Saudi state used to receive a salary from the British, as one of his own grandsons clearly stated.

And today – at the hands of the sons of 'Abdul-'Aziz – the regime throws itself completely into the lap of America, going along with its policies, responding to its every desire in exchange that it (America) will protect and defend it (the Saudi regime), and not abandon it or work to change it... even though the Saudi regime – if it was sincere in its claim to Islam, and that it is the protector of its territory – would be able, with the aid of its religious population, and with the aid of the tremendous material resources it possesses, to organise one of the mightiest armies in the world, able to strike fear into the heart of America, an army possessing power and a firm 'Aqidah... however unfortunately they have not done any of that.

Its position is that of any other Arab regime... it does no more than to prepare an army to defend the ruling regime from its own people in the event of any attempt to change or oppose it... upon the principle "a lion against me, but an ostrich in war"!

[b][c] It is a racist, nationalist regime that allies or opposes on the basis of relation with the nation. It divides rights and obligations among the slaves of Allah on the basis of relation with the Saudi nation and its borders, and not on the basis of relation with the 'Aqidah and the religion... in the same manner as any other Arab regime.

And this is clear Kufr (Kufr Bawah) as the Saudi Permanent Committee (al-Lajnah ad-Da'imah) for Ifta' have themselves said in one of their Fatawa: "Whoever does not distinguish between the Jews and the Christians and the other infidels and between the Muslims except by nationality, and makes all of their rulings equal, then he is a Kafir."

And they were correct in that, however our question to these esteemed ones is this: Is not the Saudi regime like this? Is it other than what you have described? Is it not that the Kafir, Zindeeq (heretic) Saudi – because of his nationality and his connection with the Saudi state – enjoys certain rights, favours, and privileges that "Shaykhul-Islam" from outside Sa'udiyyah does not?

The problem of single unmarried women has reached its peak, yet along with that – according to the law – the Saudi woman is not allowed to be married to a man with whose religion and character she is pleased if he does not belong to the borders of the Saudi nation... and likewise, the Saudi man is not allowed to marry outside Sa'udiyyah until he has reached a certain advanced age, along with fulfilling certain conditions, and after receiving special royal permission, for which Allah has not sent down any authority... the Messenger of Allah (sallallahu 'alayhi wa-sallam) spoke truly when he said: "If you do not (marry), there will be Fitnah and widespread evil in the earth."

[d] It is a regime which along with its army has not shown any support – whether real or pretended – towards any of the important issues facing the Muslims today... Show me a single Islamic Jihadi movement that wished to establish an Islamic life in their countries and lift the oppression of the Tawagheet, that the Saudi regime or its army - not the Muslim Saudi population – provided help or support?

Hundreds of massacres of the Muslims have occurred in their countries... the lands usurped and the rights of the inhabitants violated... so what was the stance of the Saudi regime and its army? Nothing! The most they could do is to allow the Mashayikh to make Du'a' for the Muslims... or to collect a few monetary donations to pacify the anger of the people, and send them to the representative body of the state that is slaughtering the Muslims, as occurred when they sent the donations of the Saudi people to the Muslims in Chechnya via the murderous Russian state, so that it used this money to increase the atrocities and massacres that it was inflicting on the Muslims!

Tell me – if only once – that the Saudi regime and its army have ever shown anger for the sake of Allah and the 'Aqidah... just once!

The Hindus have been slaughtering the Muslims in India and Kashmir for years... yet along with that, the Saudi regime maintains perfect diplomatic and non-diplomatic ties with India!

The Muslims in Chechnya have been slaughtered at the hands of the Russian crusaders for years... yet along with that, the Saudi regime maintains perfect diplomatic ties with Russia!

The Muslims in the Philippines have been slaughtered for years at the hands of the Philippine crusaders... yet along with that, the Saudi regime maintains perfect diplomatic ties with the Philippines! And it seeks a helping hand from them, as if there was nothing wrong!

America invaded Afghanistan, and lately they invaded Iraq, and it is behind every massacre that is perpetrated at the hands of the Zionist Jews in Palestine... yet along with that, the Saudi regime maintains perfect diplomatic, economic, military and brotherly ties with America! And it gives away its petrol to America and to other countries, all of whom supply the Zionist occupation of Palestine... and today the Saudi regime is leading the Arabs – with all its pomp and arrogance – in a process of total surrender to the Zionist state of the Jews!

Even communist China... the Saudi regime has good diplomatic ties and friendship with it!

The list is extensive... Bring me a single state that wages war against Islam and the Muslims – and how many of them there are – from which the Saudi regime ever cut relations with because of its waging war against Islam and the Muslims... you will not find a single one!

A regime that shows no anger for the sake of Allah, not even once... and does not show alliance and enmity for Allah's sake, not even once... how can it be called Islamic? How?

How is it possible to harmonise between these facts and their claim that they rule by the Book and the Sunnah?

[e] It is a regime that does not hide its clear allegiance to the enemies of the Ummah in any battle that the enemy wages against the Ummah, and against Islam and the Muslims... Here is America, waging a vicious war against Islam and the Muslims, claiming that it is fighting "terrorism"... invading and occupying the Muslim lands... yet along with that it receives nothing from the Saudi regime except for concessions, and all types of support and aid... until it has even prevented the Muslims from even making Du'a' against America in their Masajid! And the news of the American military bases in the Arabian Peninsula is not far off from us!

[f] It is a regime that has abolished Jihad in the Way of Allah, indeed erased it from its vocabulary and thinking, it has waged war against its people and hunted them down, imprisoned their 'Ulama', and put together an army that has no other purpose but to protect the Saudi throne and the Saudi regime!

[g] The Saudi regime has entered into treaties, alliances, constitutions and organisations stemming from the United Nations and others... all of which oppose and contradict the Shari'ah of Allah (ta'ala).

[h] It is a regime that funds and hosts many TV channels that propagate immorality and Kufr, and likewise it funds and hosts many newspapers and magazines – national, international, and local – that propagate Kufr, atheism and secularism, and their names are well-known among the people... and it follows that it is responsible for them all, and everything that is propagated and broadcast therein!

It is a regime that when the king is insulted, or his high status called into question, the one who did so will be identified and dragged out from his hiding place, and subjected to the severest kinds of torture and imprisonment and penalties, and may even be killed... yet when Allah is insulted openly in broad daylight – as in the worthless story "al-Karadeeb" written by the Saudi Zindeeq, Turki al-Hamd, in which he said: "So Allah and the Shaytan are two faces of a single invention"!! – he is left without any objection or account, free to roam throughout the land as he wishes... and indeed, his books and stories full of Kufr and heresy are allowed to be printed by the Saudi state with complete freedom!!

Do you not see that if it was said: "Fahd or the crown prince and the Shaytan are two faces of a single invention" that the writer would be able to sleep a single night in his home? Or that his books would be allowed to be printed and distributed?!!

Is this how the "State of Tawhid" – as they claim – should be? The ruling king is greater and higher in status than Allah (ta'ala) – may He be Exalted and Glorified?!!

And if it is said: Maybe the king or the crown prince does not know all of this?

I say: So how is it then that they know about everyone who speaks about their king and their ruler, or one of their princes, even if his speech is in secret on the telephone... yet they are unaware of what is written, printed, and distributed among the people?!!

Allah (ta'ala) spoke the truth about them when He said [meaning]:

[i]"And from the people are those who take rivals besides Allah, loving them as they love Allah. And those who believe have more love for Allah. And if the oppressors could see when they witness the torment, that all power belongs to Allah, and that Allah is Severe in torment."

And He (ta'ala) said [meaning]:

"What is wrong with you, that you give no reverence to Allah, when He has created you in stages?"

[j] The Saudi regime, represented by its rulers and princes, is instrumental in usurping the wealth and resources of the Ummah. So a part of it is poured into the pockets and the bellies of the rulers and princes, so that they can spend it on satisfying their desires and lusts as they pleases... and they are above being questioned or brought to account, no matter how much one of them might spend... and they are above being asked: "Where did you get that?"...

And a bigger part of that is poured into the pockets and the interests of the enemies of the Ummah... As for the helpless and oppressed people who cannot do anything, they are left to feed of the scraps that fall from the tables of these wasteful, oppressive Tawagheet!

So all of these faces together – and there are many more that we have not mentioned – bring us to the certain conclusion that the Saudi regime is an un-Islamic, Kafir regime... Islam is in one valley, and the regime of Al Sa'ud is in another valley. Likewise, everyone who supports, protects, and defends this regime from among the kings, princes and other than them from their associates who carry out their will, they are all Kuffar and apostates. And it is not befitting for anyone who knows the religion of Allah and who knows the reality of this regime and its supporters to doubt this fact.

And what we say regarding the Saudi regime, we likewise say the same regarding its oppressive army, for it is an army just like any of the other Arab armies, put together for the sole purpose of aiding the Tawagheet and defending their thrones and their interests. So it is an army that turns along with the desires of the ruling Taghut, with its allegiance and enmity based on that... making peace with whoever the Taghut makes peace, even if he is a Kafir at war against Islam and the Muslims, and making war with whoever the Taghut makes war, even if he is one of the best people on the earth.

It is unknown that it has ever waged a single battle in the Way of Allah, despite the abundance of battlefields... So it is impossible that an army of this description can be considered an Islamic army, even if most of its troops and commanders establish the Prayer, for this might save an individual among them, however it is impossible for us to describe or the army as a whole, with its organisation and purposes, as Islamic or to rule it as Islamic, or that it is the army that wages Jihad in the Way of Allah to make the Word of Allah superior!

[2] The foregoing ruling on the regime is a general one, and it does not imply by necessity the Kufr of everyone who argues on behalf of the regime or enters into its supporters; and this is due to the many misconceptions and illusions that people have regarding this regime, which are propagated by the Mashayikh and agents of the Sultan... Therefore, in order to apply this ruling to individuals it is necessary for the conditions of Takfeer to be fulfilled, along with the absence of any nullifying factors.

For many of those who argue of behalf of this regime are unaware of the realities that we have previously mentioned... and many of those who are aware of them do not believe them... and many of those who do believe them are unaware that they are Mukaffirah (i.e. take a person out of Islam and make him a Kafir)... and many of those who know that they are Mukaffirah will say to you: "I follow our great Mashayikh, they know more than me or you, and they have given me a Fatwa different to what you have given and explained"... and all of this needs to be taken into account when applying a ruling to individuals from among the people who argue on behalf of this regime and on behalf of the Tawagheet ruling this regime!

[3] It is not allowed to take the foregoing ruling on the regime and apply it to the whole Saudi society or its organisations, for the Saudi society is a Muslim society, and its people are predominantly religious and they establish the Prayer, and to Allah belongs all praise.

[4] Some of the mistakes of the people of knowledge regarding this regime are due to a number of matters:

[a] One of them is that many of the Mashayikh and Du'at see only the good side of the regime, and they do not want to see from it other than this side, neither to hear from it except from this side... Therefore, you see one of them when he speaks, saying: "The Waliyyul-Amr – may Allah preserve him! – ordered the building of the Masajid... and printing the Masahif... and building schools for memorising the Qur'an... and he ordered the printing of such-and-such book at his own personal expense..." And he will say more than once: "We rule by the Book and the Sunnah... and all praise is due to Allah that He has granted us an Imam and a king like this!"

And it has escaped these unaware ones, who have strayed and caused others to stray, that the regime is incapable of doing more than the aforementioned things... and what they have mentioned about their regime is also done and claimed by many of the secularist, infidel Arab regimes, maybe moreso!

Another of them is that many of the Saudi Mashayikh and Du'at compare the situation of the other Arab regimes, and how their people suffer from religious persecution, with the Saudi regime... and one of them comes to the conclusion that the Saudi regime is a thousand times better than those regimes... and from there he begins to be happy with the regime, and maybe he might increase in his attachment to it, so he goes astray and leads others astray!

And we admit that the Saudi regime, despite its faults that we mentioned before, is better than many of the other Arab regimes... but this does not allow us to attach ourselves to or be happy with a Kafir regime, even if it the least in Kufr compared to the other regimes... So the issue in truth is a comparison between Kufr and a greater Kufr, or between greater Kufr and a Kufr even greater that it... and the issue does not go beyond this.

[b][c] Another of them is that there are those from among the Mashayikh and Du'at who live outside Sa'udiyyah, due to their need to perform the obligation of Hajj, and their affection for visiting the noble Haramayn, so you see them preferring to keep silent regarding the crimes of the regime and its acts of Kufr... and maybe they will compromise and exaggerate... so they go astray and lead others astray... and there is no strength or power except with Allah.

[5] So if it is said: Does the Kufr of the regime necessitate going out (Khuruj) against it? (i.e. fighting it and overthrowing it)

I say: Yes, from the Shar'i perspective it is Wajib (obligatory) to go out against it, however from the practical perspective, this has certain conditions, stages, and necessary preparations, and I do not see that it should be done before the fulfillment of these conditions, stages and necessary preparations. And one of them is that the idea of going out against the Kufr regimes should be the dominant idea among the majority of the Muslims.

And until the time that these are fulfilled, there is no objection according to the Shari'ah – if you find the ability and are safe from a greater evil occurring – to acting on this, by eliminating – on an individual basis – those whose Fitnah is threatening the lands and the people, from among the ruling Tawagheet of Kufr and injustice, and putting the people and the land to rest from them... for eliminating one of the ruling Tawagheet of Kufr and injustice and removing him from the path of the people is easier than effecting a rebellion and overthrowing the entire regime along with all of its special organisations!

[6] So if it is said: What about the Mabahith (the intelligence services), the security services, the Mukhabarat, the agents of the regime... what is the stance towards them?

I say: The Mabahith and the agents of the Mukhabarat are the guard dogs of the Taghut who stay up to protect the Taghut and his rule and his oppression... I do not advise dealing with them – nor with other than them from the guard dogs of the rulers, except one whose Fitnah has grievously afflicted the land and the people – especially in lands such as the Arabian Peninsula, for fear of widening the circle of the conflict, falling into what is forbidden, frightening the peaceful people – except in the case of self-defence... So if they catch up with you, O brother Mujahid, and seek to kill you or imprison you and persecute you away from your religion, then by all means deal with them... fight them with a clear heart, facing them and not retreating, and if they kill you – while you are defending yourself and your religion and your honour – then you will be from the people of Paradise... and if you kill them – while they are implementing the orders of the Taghut by killing you or arresting you or persecuting you away from your religion – then they are in the Hell-fire, as is mentioned in the authentic Hadeeth.

With this I answer your question and the question of all of the other brothers who asked questions similar to yours...

And all praise is due to Allah, the Lord of all that exists.

Courtesy Of: Kalamullah.com
Posted by at No comments:

Everything you need to know about 9/11

This note is a compilation of videos and msm sources that prove the "Official Story" is indeed the real "Conspiracy Theory".

"Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories......."

"We must speak the truth about terror. Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th, malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty." - George W. Bush, speaking before the UN General Assembly 11/10/2001

-----------------
"THE OFFICIAL STORY"

----------------- 


------------------


9/11 COMMISSION “SETUP TO FAIL”

-------------

------------

Thomas Kean Runs Away From 911 Cover Up
---------
Lee Hamilton The 9/11 Commission is not the Final Truth
-----------
9/11 Commissioner slips up, says missile hit Pentagon (Tim Roemer)
-------------
911 Commissioner Bob Kerrey claims 911 was a 30 year conspiracy
-------------
Former 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”; “This investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”. "It's a scam, it's absolutely disgusting."
-------------------------
What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't
-----------------------


FAMILY MEMBERS “QUESTIONING 9/11 IS DISRESPECTFUL TO THE FAMILY MEMBERS”

Jersey Girls: Are 4 women who lost loved ones on September 11th. Were instrumental on starting the 9/11 Commission. 441 days later. Mindy Kleinberg, Kristen Breitweiser, Lorie Van Auken, and Patty Casazza.

Mindy Kleinberg Speaks @ 9/11 Commission

9/11 Truth: What's Being Covered Up? Sixth Time Asked

9/11 Family Members Demand Answers from the 9/11 Commission
--------------------
9/11 Victim Family Member : Bob McIlvaine

Donna Marsh O'Connor Begs Media To Question 911
-------------------
Kenneth Feinberg speaks on 911 victim compensation.
"No courts, no appeals,no appropriation, don't sue, tax free, waive your rights." (@1:00)
---------------------
FOX News - 9/11 family member told to shut up by Bill O'Reilly (Jeremy Glick)




IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN "WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION"

WMD LIES - Bush Cheney Rumsfeld etc. - THE ULTIMATE CLIP

General Wesley Clark explains US Invasion of Iran plans
"This is a memo that describes how we are going to take out 7 countries in 5 years. Starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia and Sudan, then back to Iran."

Cynthia McKinney confronts Richard Myers on 9/11 issues

U.S. sought attack on al-Qaida
"White House given plan days before Sept. 11"

July 2001 - U.S. plans to invade Afghanistan for an attack on Osama bin Laden and the Taliban by October 2001.

Bush Planned Afghan Invasion BEFORE 9/11, Condoleezza Rice Testimony

Opium fields guarded by U.S. troops in Afghanistan (Geraldo)

BUSH PARDON'S HIMSELF AGAINST ANY POTENTIAL WAR CRIMES THAT MAY ARISE IN THE FUTURE!

John Bolton Admits All Of These Wars Are For Oil
-------------
Anthrax Letters ““Death to America” Death to Israel” and “Allah is great”

FBI was told to blame Anthrax scare on Al Qaeda by White House officials
"WASHINGTON - In the immediate aftermath of the 2001 anthrax attacks, White House officials repeatedly pressed FBI Director Robert Mueller to prove it was a second-wave assault by Al Qaeda, but investigators ruled that out, the Daily News has learned."

Al Qaeda lab lingers in anthrax story
“Task Force agents were unable to find any link between al Qaeda and the letter attacks in the United States,”

Al Qaeda and Iraq blamed for attacks
--------------



BUSH “I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in……”

With Us or the Terrorist

With Us or Against Us (Bush)
---------------
Bush Saw 1st Plane Before Going Into Florida Classroom - 9/11 Truth
"I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on."

George W Bush ordered invasion of Afganistan on Sept. 4th. One week before 9/11

Bush talks about EXPLOSIVES in building

Bush and Cheney deny testifying under oath

Publicly, Separately, Under Oath, Accountable For Lies

Bush: Truly not concerned about bin Laden


CHENEY “Of course the orders still stand…..”

Cheney: I never linked Iraq with 9/11. Oh really?

Cheney recalls taking charge from bunker

Cheney admits he gave the order to shoot down Flight 93

Halliburton charged with selling nuclear technology to Iran 
----------------


FBI - "No Hard Evidence Connects Osama Bin Laden To 9/11"


FBI Admits "No Hard Evidence Connects Osama Bin Laden To 9/11"

FBI Bin Laden Not Wanted 'Dead or Alive' for 9-11 - FBI Director Robert Mueller, in a speech at the Commonwealth Club on April 19, 2002, said: "In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper - either here in the United States, or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere - that mentioned any aspect of the September 11 plot."

FBI CAN'T LINK BIN LADEN TO 9/11 INVESTIGATION CLOSED

9/11 FBI Finds Planted Hijacker Passport Several Blocks Away From WTC Site

"In a letter, FBI Deputy Director Michael J. Heimbach assessed AE911's presentation as "backed by thorough research and analysis.""
-------------------
FBI says that Barbara Olson's phone call to her husband lasted "0 seconds"
-----------
9/11 truthers are now labelled as "potential terrorists".
"Conspiracy theories about Westerners (e.g. the CIA arranged for 9/11 to legitimize the invasion of foreign lands")"

FOX NEWS ADMIT FBI HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN 17 FALSE FLAG TERROR NON-EVENTS (must watch)
-----------------
August 2001 - John O'Neill, former assistant director of the FBI, terrorism expert, and former lead USS Cole investigator, becomes chief of security at the WTC, but doesn't start until the day before 9/11
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/12/victim.wtc.security/




NORAD "STAND DOWN"

NORAD had drills of jets as weapons
--------------
Mark Dayton: US Senator Mark Dayton says NORAD lied about 911! (24 mins)
For the first time in NORAD history, a Vice President was in charge on 9.11. NORAD stood down for over 1 hr and 25 minutes that morning.
---------------------
Context of 'October 24-26, 2000: Military Holds Exercise Rehearsing Response to a Plane Crash at the Pentagon'
---------------------
9/11 NORAD Rehearsed Crashing Hijacked Planes Into The World Trade Center Years Before
--------------------
NORAD STAND DOWN/WAR GAMES



PNAC "A NEW PEARL HARBOR"

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor". (Page 51)
--------------
"September, 2000: The Project for a New American Century, a neo-conservative thinktank, whose members include Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Jeb Bush and Paul Wolfowitz, releases their report, entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses.” In it, they declare that "the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor."

Dick Cheney states that 9/11 achieved the goals of PNAC, "highest moment in office"
-------------


"NO WARNINGS"

---------------------
“Oh goodness no! “Never would have crossed anyone’s mind.” ~ Donald Rumsfeld,Sept.30th,2001
--------------------------------------------
“You hate to admit it, but we hadn’t thought about this.” ~ General Richard Myers, acting air defense commander, Oct.2001
----------------------------------------------
“There were no warning signs that I’m aware of that would indicate this type of operation in the country.” ~ FBI Director Robert Mueller,a couple of weeks after 9/11
----------------------------------------------
"Until the attack took place, I think it is fair to say that no one envisioned that as a possibility.” ~ WH Press Sect. Ari Fleischer
-------------------------------------------
Condi Lied Under Oath to the 9-11 Widows
“I don’t think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center.” -National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice (2002)
------------------------------------------
"nobody in our government at least, and I don't the think the prior government, could envisage flying air planes into buildings" ~ George W. Bush
-----------------
9 11 Prior Knowledge Porter Goss Statements 8 10 2004 ABC



NIST

“National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center disaster, answers to frequently asked questions”, Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, August 30, 2006. [Online]. Available: NIST, [Accessed March 17, 2008] (#8)
---------------
Towers 1 and 2: (#11)
"NIST estimated the elapsed times for the first exterior panels to strike the ground after the collapse initiated in each of the towers to be approximately 11 seconds for WTC 1 and approximately 9 seconds for WTC 2. These elapsed times were based on: (1) precise timing of the initiation of collapse from video evidence, and (2) ground motion (seismic) signals recorded at Palisades, N.Y., that also were precisely time-calibrated for wave transmission times from lower Manhattan (see NCSTAR 1-5A). [NIST 2006]" 
--------------
WTC 7:
“NIST contention is that the building collapse progressed from the penthouse out as columns were weakened by the fires. The slow sinking of the penthouses, indicating the internal collapse of the building behind the visible north wall, took 8.2 seconds according to a NIST preliminary report. Seismograph trace of the collapse of WTC 7 indicates that parts of the building were hitting the ground for 18 seconds. This means the collapse took at least 18 seconds, of which only the last approximately 15 seconds are visible in videos: 8 seconds for the penthouses and 7 seconds for the north wall to come down.”

"The analyses of the video (both the estimation of the instant the roofline began to descend and the calculated velocity and acceleration of a point on the roofline) revealed three distinct stages characterizing the 5.4 seconds of collapse:
* Stage 1 (0 to 1.75 seconds): acceleration less than that of gravity (i.e., slower than free fall).
* Stage 2 (1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)
* Stage 3 (4.0 to 5.4 seconds): decreased acceleration, again less than that of gravity"

NIST Finally Admits Freefall  (Part I)
NIST Finally Admits Freefall  (Part II)
NIST Finally Admits Freefall  (Part III)
---------------
"The focus of the investigation was on the sequence of events from the instant of aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse for each tower. For brevity in this report, this sequence is referred to as the 'probably collapse sequence,' although it does not actually include the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached and collapse became inevitable." NIST, p. 82
-------------
"None of the recovered steel samples showed evidence of exposure to temperatures above 600 degrees C for as long as 15 minutes." NIST, p. 180
-------------
"Only three of the recovered samples of exterior panels reached temperatures in excess of 250 degrees C during the fires or after the collapse. This was based on a method developed by NIST to characterize maximum temperatures experienced by steel members through observations of paint cracking." NIST, p. 181
------------
"All four test specimens sustained the maximum design load for approximately 2 hours without collapsing" NIST, p. 143
------------
"The results established that this type of assembly was capable of sustaining a large gravity load, without collapsing, for a substantial period of time relative to the duration of the fires in any given location on September 11." NIST, p. 143
------------
"23. Why did the NIST investigation not consider reports of molten steel in the wreckage from the WTC towers? 
NIST investigators and experts from the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and the Structural Engineers Association of New York (SEONY)—who inspected the WTC steel at the WTC site and the salvage yards—found no evidence that would support the melting of steel in a jet-fuel ignited fire in the towers prior to collapse. The condition of the steel in the wreckage of the WTC towers (i.e., whether it was in a molten state or not) was irrelevant to the investigation of the collapse since it does not provide any conclusive information on the condition of the steel when the WTC towers were standing. NIST considered the damage to the steel structure and its fireproofing caused by the aircraft impact and the subsequent fires when the buildings were still standing since that damage was responsible for initiating the collapse of the WTC towers. Under certain circumstances it is conceivable for some of the steel in the wreckage to have melted after the buildings collapsed. Any molten steel in the wreckage was more likely due to the high temperature resulting from long exposure to combustion within the pile than to short exposure to fires or explosions while the buildings were standing."
-------------
9/11: NIST engineer John Gross denies WTC molten steel (extended)
-------------
NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell
"NIST used detailed data...... to create the most complex computer simulation ever made." ~ Shyam Sunder

NIST WTC7 Collapse Simulation Versus Real-Time Demolition Comparison 1
-------------
The Truss Failure Theory
-----------
NIST WTC-report. What a laugh ... (truss failure)
-----------
Sunder on What Controlled Demolition Looks Like
-------------
We Have the Results and Only We Have the Results
-----------
9/11 Skepticism: NIST floor test
-----------
9/11 Skepticism: NIST fire proofing test
-------------
NIST FOIA 09-42: Release #15 -- 42A0019 -- WTC CB P1 T1 NW Camera
(This 20 minute fire couldn't even melt a single cubicle)
------------
NIST: revises theory and admits collapse unexplainable
-------------
“NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapse, which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC towers… Thus, the floors did not fail progressively to cause a pancaking phenomenon”. Sunder, W. Grosshandler, H. S. Lew, et al.
---------------
Shyam Sunder Admits There Was No Pancake Effect
-------------
Reply to NIST
"NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder stated, "Those clouds of dust may create the impression of a controlled demolition but it is the floor pancaking that leads to that perception."
---------------
Finally, an Apology From the National Geographic Channel
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/NationalGeographicApology.html
"Two years later, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) finally made clear that its "findings do not support the ˜pancake theory' of collapse."
--------------
"Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation"
-------------
Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction
--------------------
"Why do the same five or so individuals turn up in investigations relating to terrorist attacks, when, according to the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), there are 1.5 million engineers in the US? The authors of the official report on the Murrah Federal building - Gene Corley, Charles Thornton, Paul Mlaker, and Mete Sozen - were all among the initial team of the ASCE WTC investigation."



FEMA

Limited Metallurgical Examination (FEMA)
"The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified. The rate of corrosion is also unknown. It is possible that this is the result of long-term heating in the ground following the collapse of the buildings. It is also possible that the phenomenon started prior to collapse and accelerated the weakening of the steel structure. A detailed study into the mechanisms of this phenomenon is needed to determine what risk, if any, is presented to existing steel structures exposed to severe and long-burning fires." FEMA, C-13, Appendix C.6

FEMA will offer no firm conclusions about the possible role fires play in causing WTC 7 to collapse. In its 2002 report it will state, “The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time.” [FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, 5/1/2002, PP. 5-31]

"It is believed that almost all of the jet fuel that remained on the impact floors was consumed in the first few minutes of the fire." fema.gov_p22

Fema Rescuer talking about 9/11
"....we arrived late Monday night and went into action on Tuesday morning."

FEMA Trains Police The American Founding Fathers Were Terrorists

FEMA - Emergency Response to Terrorism - Self Study (June 1999)

August, 1997: The cover of FEMA’s emergency response to terrorism depicts the World Trade Center in cross-hairs.

KURT SONNENFELD : EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW9/11 FEMA videographer at Ground Zero goes public
-------------------


POPULAR MECHANICS/NOVA

Davin Coburn Interview

Popular Mechanics James Meigs admits black boxes found and studied

The Popular Mechanics 9/11 IQ Test

Debunking Novas Pancake Theory of WTC using common sense

NOVA Says WTC Was Not A Progressive Collapse


-----------

NANO THERMITE

The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe pp.7-31 (25)Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen.

9 11 Experiments The Great Thermate Debate

9/11 Experiments: The Mysterious Eutectic Steel

9/11 Theories: Expert vs. Expert

The 9/11 "Deep Mystery" and the Crazy Engineers (Molten Metal)
-----------


TOWERS “Why did the Towers fall?”

How the World Trade Center fell
"Fire reaches 800C- hot enough to melt steel floor supports."
"The protective concrete cladding on the cores…."
"Nothing is designed or will be designed to withstand that fire."

Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse?—Simple Analysis By Zdenek P. Bazant, Fellow ASCE, and Yong Zhou

National Geographic, Chief Orio Palmer (Battalion 7)
"Battalion Seven ... Ladder 15, we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines. Radio that, 78th floor numerous 10-45 Code Ones."

ABC Morning Sept 11th, Peter Jennings, 1rst Impressions


“TOWERS WERE NOT DESIGNED FOR A FULLY LOADED 767”

Frank DeMartini, World Trade Center 1973-2001 (WTC Construction Manager)
"I believe the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door, this intense grid, and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing the screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting."
--------------------
WTC 1988 Charlie Thornton Interview
"… the largest aircraft flying today, at least commercially, the 747 fully loaded is on the order of 300 tons. So if you think about a 300 ton element crashing into a building that’s been designed to carry 13,000 tons, you can see that an aircraft crashing into the World Trade Centre would probably not do anything to the major building, it could effect localized structural elements, could knock out a column, and there could be some damage but as far as a plane knocking a building over, that would not happen.”
------------------------
Charlie Thornton and Leslie Robertson discuss WTC aircraft collisions
"We designed the buildings to take the impact of the Boeing 707 hitting the building at any location." (@2:00)

Leslie Robertson – The Man Who built the Twin Towers. (Impact of a Plane (BBC) (2nd video link)

"As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running" Structural Engineer of the towers - Leslie Robertson
----------------------------------------
"HOLLOW STEEL SHAFT"

Exposing One Of The 9/11 Commission's Blatant Lies
"The outside of each tower was covered by a frame of 14-inch-wide steel columns; the centers of the steel columns were 40 inches apart. These exterior walls bore the majority of the weight of the building. "The interior core of the buildings was a hollow steel shaft, in which elevators and stairwells were grouped." John Farmer (May 18, 2004 hearing)

Core Denial
"Establishing the true nature of the core structures is of great importance given that the most widely read document on the World Trade Center attack -- the 9/11 Commission Report -- denies their very existence, claiming the towers' cores were "hollow steel shaft[s]"
----------------------
EPA "AIR WAS SAFE TO BREATHE"

Christie Whitman says air is safe days after 911

EPA Lied About 9/11 Air Quality 

W. House Molded EPA's 9/11 Reports 

Public Misled on Air Quality After 9/11 Attack, Judge Says - New York Times

-----------------
CLEAN UP "STEEL SHIPPED TO CHINA"

Mangled WTC steel bought by China
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2002-01-27/news/0201270268_1_metal-management-world-trade-center-shanghai-baosteel
"China's largest steel company denied reports that it plans to make souvenirs out of metal from the collapsed buildings. But officials at Shanghai Baosteel here said the company did buy scrap from the wreckage of the terrorist attack."

120 Trucks Full Of WTC 7 Steel Removed (9_12 10am)

WTC Cleanup Agency Begins Ramping Up Operations
--------------
Governor Pataki on Ground Zero
@ 2:00 "and you look and you see and there's no concrete. There's Very little concrete. All you see is aluminum and steel. The concrete was pulverized." 
@ 3:10 "You can see the Buildings around it that have been incredbly damaged... but thank god they are structurally sound, they aren't going to come down."

WTC Fire Extinguished
"The underground fires that have burned at the World Trade Center site, New York for the past three months have finally been extinguished, Gov. George Pataki said Wednesday." December 20, 2001 

Ground Zero's fires still burning



------------------
WTC 7 "UNEXPLAINABLE"

Geraldo Rivera 911 Truth and WTC Building 7 Controlled Demolition - BuildingWhat.org

Giuliani Claims WTC Building 7 Fell In Stages
"It occurred to all of us that it would ultimately collapse, over a ...... the way buildings.....uh..... usually collapse, which is in stages." (@1:00)

Mayor Rudy Giuliani Admits Knowing The Twin Towers Would Collapse
"When we were told that the World Trade Center was going to collapse.... and it did collapse" (@1:50)

John Kerry Says WTC 7 Brought Down In Controlled Fashion

Donald Rumsfeld Questioned About WTC 7 - Feb 2011

9/11 Joe Lieberman - WTC 7 Did Not Occur .... I Do Not Support A New Investigation


LUCKY LARRY "PULL IT"

Larry Silverstein avoids 9/11 questions

Larry Silverstein no response to WTC 7 lies

Where was Larry Silverstein on 9/11?
----------------
"I remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me that they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire. I said you know we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is "Pull It", ahhh, and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse" ---Larry Silverstein, 2002 
---------------
“Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.” Scott Shapiro - FOX NEWS
---------------

PENTAGON "MISSING 2.3 TRILLION"

Pentagon Missing $2.3 trillion, announced Sept. 10, 2001:

Must see Rumsfeld Video about Missing Trillions of Tax Payers Dollars

Anthony Antonello asks Donald Rumsfeld if he ever found that missing $2.3 Trillion

Tampering with the crime scene:

FBI Withholding 84 More Tapes of Pentagon on 9/11:
----------------
Pentagon: Trans. Sec Norman Mineta Testimony
Mineta: "During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President...the plane is 50 miles out...the plane is 30 miles out....and when it got down to the plane is 10 miles out, the young man also said to the vice president "do the orders still stand?" And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said "Of course the orders still stand, have you heard anything to the contrary!??""

Police Lieutenant Didn't See Any Airplane Parts At The Pentagon
-----------------
Here are the two Pentagon security cams.
"10+ years have gone by and still no 757."
------------------
Live CNN Report of Jamie McIntyre at the Pentagon
“From my close up inspection there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon... ...The only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage ­­­— nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon.” ­­­— Jamie McIntyre (CNN)

Jamie McIntyre Contradiction (CNN News)
--------------
CBS - Senator cut off in the middle of 9/11 prior knowledge discussion
------------
Pentagon: Some 9-11 Remains Went to Landfill
-------------
5200 Pentagon Employees PURCHASED Child Pornography! Why Is This Not A Bigger Story?



FLIGHT 93 "NOSE DIVE IN THE DIRT"

"This is the most eerie thing," he told a Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reporter for an article on the first anniversary of the attacks. "I have not, to this day, seen a single drop of blood. Not a drop." Coroner Wallace Miller

“there was nothing that you could distinguish that a plane had crashed there” Chris Konicki

"Well...there was no plane. There was what you see a hole. and that is the dirt that the airliner threw out--and the hole, about 6 meters deep...and that was all there was." Shanksville Mayor Ernie Stull

Rumsfeld said Flight 93 shot down

CNN - Flight 93 "nearly vaporized"

911 Flight 93's Mysterious Second Debris Field at Indian Lake Miles Away



-------------------


AL QAEDA "19 HIGHJACKERS WITH BOX CUTTERS"

“Al Qaeda” is not really a terrorist network but a “Database” of international mujaheddin and arms smugglers used by the CIA and Saudis to funnel guerrillas, arms, and money into Soviet-occupied Afghanistan.
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=24738 

CIA: At most, 50-100 Al Qaeda in Afghanistan
"In an EXCLUSIVE interview on “This Week,” CIA Director Leon Panetta told host Jake Tapper that there were “at most” only 50-100 Al Qaeda in Afghanistan.

Clinton admits the U.S government created and funded the terrorists which they are fighting today

Hillary on CNN and Al-Qaeda
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TBZNKjHbDc 

BBC: Al Qaeda doesn't exist!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mztfFdpd1Rk&


BOX CUTTERS "WEAPON OF CHOICE"

Boxcutters Weren't Allowed Pre-9/11
http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-500164_162-528967.html

Pre-9/11 rules barred box cutters
http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2002/2002-11-11-box-cutters.htm

Context of 'November 11, 2002: Box Cutters and Pepper Spray Were Banned by Airlines on 9/11'
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a111102boxcutters
----------------

OBL “THE MASTERMIND BEHIND 911”

Osama Bin Laden Pronounced Dead…For the Ninth Time
http://www.corbettreport.com/osama-bin-laden-pronounced-dead-for-the-ninth-time/

Report: Bin Laden Already Dead
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,41576,00.html 

SEPTEMBER 17TH,2001 CNN REPORT - Osama Bin Laden says he wasn't behind attacks: 
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/
"DOHA, Qatar (CNN) -- Islamic militant leader Osama bin Laden, the man the United States considers the prime suspect in last week's terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, denied any role Sunday in the actions believed to have killed thousands."

"Bin Laden meets CIA agent while at Dubai Hospital in July, 2001"
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a070401dubai#a070401dubai

9 11 Bin Laden At Rawalpindi Hospital September 10th 1 28 2002 CBS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OW4A-yd9BI

Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US (Bush’s PBD)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin_Ladin_Determined_To_Strike_in_US

Osama Bin Laden Watching Himself On TV
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DB0ftf53JYs

Rumsfeld Describes Elaborate Cave System in Afghanistan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQzbKj6JSmM

Paul Bremer interview, NBC, 12:46, 9/11 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2pW6WZhZrQ
Paul Bremer (Marsh & McClennan executive on 9-11) was on MSM within a couple hours telling everyone that OBL is the prime suspect. Iran and Iraq as well.


"THEY HATE OUR FREEDOMS"

"Why do they hate US?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6HOcLWP-Ls 

“Today, our fellow citizens, our way of life, our very freedom came under attack in a series of deliberate and deadly terrorist acts. . . . America was targeted for attack because we’re the brightest beacon for freedom and opportunity in the world.” ~ George W. Bush, address to the nation, September 11, 2001

“They hate our freedoms: our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other.” ~ George W. Bush, address to Congress, September 20, 2001

What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1bm2GPoFfg

9 11 Aftermath Discussion on giving up Civil Liberties NBC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeCGZJKwL_o&

9 11 Aftermath Paul Bremer Talks About Not Giving Up Civil Liberties NBC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soAGSevjumk&
-----------------

OBAMA

Obama Warns Not To Challenge Official 9/11 Story
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuASoVK8f9c

Obama Ignores Leaders Who Question 9/11: German Science & Tech Minister
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nl3Mfq7ethU&
-------------
Top Obama czar: Infiltrate all 'conspiracy theorists'
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=121884#ixzz1d3faoo86 

"In a lengthy academic paper, President Obama’s regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, argued the U.S. government should ban “conspiracy theorizing.” 
Conspiracy Theories
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1084585

Obama Information Czar Cass Sunstein Confronted on Cognitive Infiltration of Conspiracy Groups
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OIiOztc52g&
-------------

MISC

Hillary Clinton: US Losing Information War to Alternative Media
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyjnEm8DZkI

Bill Clinton says 9/11 Truthers are idiots
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pk7-XfE7KcU 

Ashcroft: It's Okay To Waterboard U.S. Soldiers 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKflMqgWcQ8

George Bush and John Kerry Skull and Bones Members:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPh7sUvhZ3E

Rumsfeld shuck hands with Saddam
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaP7ZrmkcuU

Dueling Puppets [I'm speechless]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RK7g8nGkF8s&
This should tell you something about our elected "leaders".

THE BEST VIDEO ON "OCCUPY THE WORLD"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S880UldxB1o
When other countries protest against their Government it's called "begging for Democracy", but when Americans do it, it's called "Anti American". The hypocrisy is all too transparent.

-------------
WORLD VIEWS

Bush, Blair found guilty of war crimes in Malaysia tribunal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vURFsQv5GPs&

9/11 Japanese main opposition party questions 9/11 in parliament
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2680190129949942423

Top Egyptian presidential candidate doubts al Qaeda role in 9/11 (Mohamed Morsi)
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/may/31/egyptian-candidate-doubts-al-qaeda-role-9-11/

Former President of Italy Francesco Cossiga: 9/11 was "carried out by the American CIA and the Mossad".
http://www.corriere.it/politica/07_novembre_30/osama_berlusconi_cossiga_27f4ccee-9f55-11dc-8807-0003ba99c53b.shtml

"We do not believe you!" German Business Journal Questions 9/11
http://www.911video.de/news/080110/en.html

German Federal Judge Dieter Deiseroth
http://www.911video.de/news/151209/indexen.html

Italian Judge Fernando Imposimato Hague denounces the U.S.: "They knew the September 11"
http://affaritaliani.libero.it/roma/imposimato-denuncia-gl-usa-all-aja-sapevano-dell-11-settembre-10102011.html?refresh_ce


SIMPLE FACTS OF TEMPERATURE
----------------------
Simple Facts of Temperatures:
~1535ºC (2795ºF) - melting point of iron.
~1510ºC (2750ºF) - melting point of typical structural steel.
~825ºC (1517ºF) - maximum temperature of hydrocarbon fires burning in the atmosphere without pressurization or pre-heating (premixed fuel and air - blue flame).
Diffuse flames burn far cooler. Oxygen-starved diffuse flames are cooler yet.
The fires in the Towers were diffuse and well below 800ºC.
Source: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/melting-temperature-metals-d_860.html

Jet Fuel (JET A-1): "Commercial jet fuel is essentially kerosene..."
~260-315°C (500-599°F) - open air burning temperature of JET A-1.
~980°C (1796°F) - maximum burning temperature of JET A-1.
Sources: 
http://mepetroleum.com/jet_fuel.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_fuel

Other:
~2500ºC (4532ºF) - maximum temperature of Thermite.
~660ºC (1120ºF) - melting point of Aluminum (turns silver rapidly when cooled).
~233ºC (451ºF) - Ignition temperature of paper (No chemicals added).
~1800-2500°C (3272-4532°F) - Melting point of Concrete
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)